In the 1940's with paper logs, and no robot to cross-check them, I can see
that could be a problem.
70 years later we now have computerized logs and extensive cross-comparison
of logs by the robot.
Such tactics today would stand out like a sore (something) and be easily
detectable as blatant cheating. Don't punish it with losing a couple Q's.
Issue a DQ.
Meanwhile quit draconian punishment of a simple logging error. Take away
the farkled Q. Move along people, nothing left here to see.
73, de Hans, K0HB
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 12:17 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending Call getting worse?
In the old days I think I remember it was called Callbooking. Where a
missing mult was "Fabricated" or even more hidden were just QSO's even
to padd the qso count.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|