It would be far more practical (and far less expensive) to set up a
foundation to support the contests directly instead of indirectly
through a struggling enterprise. I'm not saying that either make sense,
but an albatross is an albatross.
Dave AB7E
On 1/30/2014 1:52 PM, Charles Harpole wrote:
I do not want to make any dire judgments, but the Contesting community
depends heavily on the CQ Magazine and its extensive support for
contesting. This wonderful service to ham radio must not be allowed to
wither in any way.
Let me suggest that the wealthy among hamdom begin a quiet discussion about
how ham radio can join together to keep this vital magazine and service
fully functional. I am too retired to help financially, but there are deep
pockets, thankfully, among hamdom and what better way to keep ham radio
alive and well than to continue this magazine and its contesting services.*
Personally, I think that if ham radio can raise a HALF MILLION DOLLARS to
activate FT5Z for twenty days, surely this magazine, much more important
and long lasting for ham radio, can be continued. Perhaps a foundation
can become the sponsor; many wise heads here surely know how this can be
done financially. Perhaps a digital distribution can be done (and take
free articles instead of paying for them, and other ideas).
This move can serve much more than contesters, but it sure does impact us.
Can we have some leadership on this matter? 73,
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|