| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Radio Laws of Propagation....Have theybeenre-invented? |
| From: | "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com> |
| Reply-to: | David Thompson <thompson@mindspring.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:33:16 -0500 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
No matter what the station sent its the power classification he entered. If
he was running 1500W and entered the low power classification then he
should be disqualified.
The station Herb mentioned has been on most contest directors radar for a long time. Herb is right that its discouraging to go to the Caribbean and have a cheater beat you when everything you did was on the up and up. 73 Dave K4JRB Retired CQ 160 Contests DirectorDXAC SE Division ARRL _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Radio Laws of Propagation....Have they been re-invented?, Edward Sawyer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Fwd: Radio Laws of Propagation, PCA |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Radio Laws of Propagation....Have they beenre-invented?, Yuri Blanarovich |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Radio Laws of Propagation....Have theybeenre-invented?, Saulius Zalnerauskas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |