CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] History of Low Power Category

To: "k5zd@charter.net" <k5zd@charter.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] History of Low Power Category
From: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 07:13:34 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
>Can anyone explain the history of the ARRL selection of 150W?  The slightly
>higher power level can be reached by some radios, but it also encourages
>"low power" stations to run an amplifier to gain that extra db between 100W
>and 150W. 

I am only guessing at one time it was 150 watts input, when input power was the 
measure outlined in FCC rules, and rigs that had a pair of 6146 finals ran 
about 150 watts input.  If the number was not changed when output became the 
measure the low power limit was essentially doubled.

73...Stan, K5GO



Sent from my iPad

> On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:38 AM, "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net> wrote:
> 
> Can anyone explain the history of the ARRL selection of 150W?  The slightly
> higher power level can be reached by some radios, but it also encourages
> "low power" stations to run an amplifier to gain that extra db between 100W
> and 150W. 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>