CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest competitiveness

To: "RT Clay" <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest competitiveness
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 14:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Even worse than the whale....  Some guys have way too much skill.....  Follow 
this link http://www.tnellen.com/westside/harrison.pdf for some ideas on 
leveling the field.


Dit dit






73, de Hans, K0HB
"Just a Boy and his Radio"
           7⃣3⃣

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:11 PM, RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> This topic keeps coming back...and underneath that elephant is the whale in 
> the room: propagation advantage of different locations which is an even 
> bigger factor in both DX and domestic contests. Things can be done by contest 
> sponsors to offset it a little- for example hold domestic contests at 
> different times of the year; choice of multipliers and maybe distance-based 
> scoring in DX contests.
> Tor
> N4OGW
> On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:37 AM, David Cockrum <n5do@sbcglobal.net> 
> wrote:
>  
>>
>>
>>As I read the responses about the history of low power, specifically 150 
>>vs 100 watts, I think we are missing the elephant in the room.When it 
>>comes to factors that help an operator do well in contests at the top of 
>>the list should go antennas.We divide competitors in many contests into 
>>three categories based on power:high, low, and qrp.Yet in each of these 
>>categories the best scores are made by those with the best antenna systems.
>>
>>For the most part the power categories divide us into groups that 
>>correspond to antenna systems as well.The stations with big antenna 
>>systems usually operate in the high power category, those of us with 
>>lesser systems often operate in low power and QRP categories.
>>
>>From my point of view I have a small antenna system (SteppIR at 50 
>>feet), but I know I have it much better than many others.After every 
>>contest in which a relatively large number of "casual" operators are 
>>worked, I receive many QSL cards which state the antenna is a "wire 
>>antenna in the attic," multiband vertical, or other marginal antenna.
>>
>>As long as there are communities that regulate antenna height and deeds 
>>with restrictive covenants, contesting will continue to have a hard time 
>>attracting new blood to replace our aging membership. No one wants to 
>>compete in an activity in which they have little chance to do well. 
>>Perhaps every contest should have a category for those individuals with 
>>restricted space antennas.
>>
>>73,
>>
>>Dave, N5DO
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>CQ-Contest mailing list
>>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>