CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Prefills in SS Exchnages

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Prefills in SS Exchnages
From: John Laney <k4bai@att.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:41:58 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
During the lifetime of W4AN, I often used his call when I was guest operator. I don't remember for sure if I changed the check to "54" when I was guest op there in SS. If so, it was a mistake.

I was guest op once for NAQP CW in one January and I used "John" instead of "Bill" for my name. That was definitely a mistake that I only fully realized when some weak backscatter station on 15M thought I was W4AU John VA instead of W4AN John GA. The similarily of the two very active stations hadn't occurred to me. I had thought about pre fill name and had decided I was going to be John in spite of Bill's advice that I should probably be Bill.

I now feel that prefills are a mistake. One of my logging programs is an old one the predates the break up of the RAC section ON. I went into the ss.mlt file and deleted ON and added ONN, ONE, ONS, and GTA. They are all accepted now, but it prefils "ONN" in place of the former "ON" and I have to change all the others to the correct abbreviation. I suppose there is some way to change that, but I don't know how. It prefills only for RAC sections and NT, VI, PAC, and PR. And it prefills "VI" for some, but not all, KG4 calls.

I decided a long time ago, in the late 1990s after looking at my CW SS UBN report that I had an inordinate number of errors on Precedences when "A" was logged rather than some other letter. The program put in "A" probably as the most common precedence. I decided that when I was struggling to put weak exchanges together, if the "A" was prefilled, I was more likely not to correct it to the correct precedence that if the space was blank until I put something in it. K8CC was very kind to revise his NA logging program to delete the "A" prefil and my UBN report improved considerably for the next year.

My opinion is that prefills are OK for casual operators who don't intend to send in a log or who don't care if the log contains mistakes, but, for the serious operator, to use a prefill is a mistake. If it is for something that practically never ever changes, such as RAC sections, it isn't that much of a problem. But, there still exists a possibility that a prefill for a VE4 call of MB might cause you not to realize that the weak caller was actually a KE4 or a WE4 in some other section. Slight chance that you might be confused or misled by even the most innocent of prefills.

I do recognize that a very few Canadian ops do not think that they need to sign portable outside their home province, but the instances of that being done actually on the air have been few. A VE6 or VA6 used to operate in SK without a portable designator or maybe it was a VE or VA5 in AB. And once or twice there have been VY0 calls used from Ontario without a portable designator.

Prefilling a KH6 or KL7 with HI or AK can cause you to overlook that the KL7 is in VA or the KH6 is in OR, for example.

73, John, K4BAI.

73, John, K4BAI.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>