More or less something we were missing in the rules !
I agree!
Braco
E77DX
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] Im Auftrag von Davor
Kucelin via CQ-Contest
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Dezember 2014 10:32
An: cq-contest@contesting.com
Betreff: Re: [CQ-Contest] Need clarification from DL1MGB
I agree with 4O3A in this case as many others
"1. Number of contests for qualifying to maximum - 8 (eight). It will give
more chance to simpler stations and will make qualifications
more attractive. Does it has a sense if we, more or less, already
know who will be qualified, and it depends only on how large station
is? I belong to those who are privileged, but I do not like it at all.
2. To count contests in season 2017, giving to us enough of time, as we
all have family, business and private life.
3. Not to change numbers of teams in EU areas, and to keep it as it was
before. Needless to make more comments on how it is now in rules.
4. To make visible difference between Unassisted/Assisted, giving 0,9
to assisted, for example
5. To keep MS scores weightiness same as SOAB, as it was before. With
factor 0,9 we will push MS contesting by side in next two years. MS
is much more closer to WRTC principle, than SOAB Assisted. Thanks to
same weighting factor of SOAB and MS in previous qualification
period for WRTC in USA, we have had very attractive and intensive MS
fighting in EU and USA, and some continental records are increased
significantly."
73 Dave 9A1UN / PW5G WRTC 2006 / K1G WRTC 2014
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|