The Board voted based on the recommendation of the DXAC.
The DXAC based their decision on input from the ARRL members. At least in
theory.
Of course, it would have been nice if the DXAC rep from each Division had at
least made a token effort to gather input from the membership. All i can tell
you is that I never heard a whisper regarding a request for input -- neither as
a Member or as a Newsletter Editor who would have printed such a request to
inform people.
Ultimately, though, it doesn't matter. Either YOU have integrity in how YOU
operate in contests, chase DX, and apply for awards... or YOU don't.
If YOU don't, your accomplishments are meaningless. If YOU do, then they are
not. (And I mean "YOU" as in the reader, not in Paul or any one individual
specifically)
73, ron w3wn
On 01/22/15, Paul O'Kane wrote:
On 22/01/2015 02:51, Gerry Hull wrote:
> For those of you who are interested in cross-entity remote operation, it
> will now count for
> both contesting and DXCC, for stations on both ends of the QSO. The
> transmitter country
> will determine the entity for DXCC.
The intent of the new rule is stated to be -
“It will continue to be up to the operator to decide what
types of legal remote control operating he/she will use
(if any) to contribute to an operating award,”
It's clear this represents an abdication of responsibility
by the ARRL. Welcome to the brave new world of the American
Internet Relay League.
73,
Paul EI5DI
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|