CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] K4VV in ARRL DX CW

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] K4VV in ARRL DX CW
From: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:50:03 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Larry,

The requirement is still the same - hasn't changed.

73,

Jim N6VH


On 27-Feb-15 10:03 AM, Larry wrote:
At one time the FCC requirement was  supposedly VE1RM/W1 but someone
cited the regs a while back saying that is no longer the required form.
Unfortunately, I don't recall where that discussion took place - in one
of the groups.

73, Larry  W6NWS

-----Original Message----- From: Gerry Hull
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:04 PM
To: Edward Sawyer
Cc: CQ-Contest ; sm2ekm@bdtv.se
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] K4VV in ARRL DX CW

Actually, not so Ed,

VE1/W1VE or W1/VE1RM is the accepted international standard.   In the US
and Canada, no authority is going to get bent out of shape if you do it the
other way around.

Of course, I can't use either of these samples, because I'm licensed in
each country.

73, Gerry W1VE & VE1RM





On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net> wrote:

Actually, the reciprocal agreement between the US and Canada requires you
to
sign N1UR/VE2 not VE2/N1UR.



Ed  N1UR

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>