30 or so years ago, that was the format, and I believe it is still
specified in the reciprocal agreement between the US and Canada, but the
rest of the world has moved on.
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.
On 2/27/2015 1:03 PM, Larry wrote:
At one time the FCC requirement was supposedly VE1RM/W1 but someone
cited the regs a while back saying that is no longer the required
form. Unfortunately, I don't recall where that discussion took place -
in one of the groups.
73, Larry W6NWS
-----Original Message----- From: Gerry Hull
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:04 PM
To: Edward Sawyer
Cc: CQ-Contest ; sm2ekm@bdtv.se
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] K4VV in ARRL DX CW
Actually, not so Ed,
VE1/W1VE or W1/VE1RM is the accepted international standard. In the US
and Canada, no authority is going to get bent out of shape if you do
it the
other way around.
Of course, I can't use either of these samples, because I'm licensed in
each country.
73, Gerry W1VE & VE1RM
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net>
wrote:
Actually, the reciprocal agreement between the US and Canada requires
you
to
sign N1UR/VE2 not VE2/N1UR.
Ed N1UR
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|