This is a pitiful comment, ostensibly made by the ARRL "contact person."
This shows complete disregard for their customers and also shows that they
don't care about it.
ARRL made a big deal out of it (100 year anniversary), so they should have
modified the LC
to account for that.
And "everyone" was not affected the same way...only those poor souls who need
W1AW/5 for a
sweep and were unlucky enough to also work W1AW/1.
Sounds like the LC author(s) and/or ARRL were just too lazy to do the right
thing. Acknowledging
the mistake and then doing nothing about it is clearly a poor decision. That
action would not stand in
the business world where customers actually matter.
How unfortunate.
de Doug KR2Q
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|