CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Distance-Based Ranking

To: "'cq-contest@contesting.com (cq-contest@contesting.com)'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Distance-Based Ranking
From: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 04:24:55 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
FWIW, an idea that has floated around the back of my mind is some kind of 
matrix-based scoring, where points for a Q vary by (your zone), (other zone), 
(band) based on some kind of degree of difficulty, as measured by prior years' 
logs, and perhaps allowing for such mechanics as the same Q having different 
point values for the stations involved.

Zone 14 to zone 15 on 20 or 40m?  That's 1 point.
Zone 1 to zone 39 on 160m?  That's 100 points.

It still wouldn't be a level playing field, for reasons that have been 
discussed previously, ad nauseam.  But it could be a variation that could lead 
to some interesting strategic considerations.


-- 
Michael Adams | N1EN | mda@n1en.org
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>