I agree! I operate QRP in CQWW and ARRL DX CW contests. I can almost never
can get a run going in the CQWW contest. I am sure that DX stations skip
over me because they don't want to spend the time digging me out of the
noise. I think if the DX station suspected that I was QRP and was worth
extra points he might have more incentive.
BTW I'm NOT going to send /QRP after my callsign!
73
Dave, N1IX
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
W5GN
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 3:38 PM
To: 'Matt Murphy'; k9yc@arrl.net
Cc: 'cq-contest'
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Distance-Based Ranking
If we are going to change scoring, I think working a QRP station should be
worth 3 points TO THE RECEIVING STATION, not to the TRANSMITTING STATION,
and 2 points for RECEIVING a LOW POWER station.
73
Barry, W5GN
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Matt Murphy
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 2:16 PM
To: k9yc@arrl.net
Cc: cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Distance-Based Ranking
I propose something like the following approach to calculating QSO points:
1) One point for every grid square traversed by the signal (the shortest
path between the two stations).
2) Add a point for each of the above grids that are at least 80% covered by
land.
3) Square the result.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
wrote:
> On Tue,11/10/2015 3:15 PM, Ward Silver wrote:
>
>> Distance-based scoring really won't work for bands on which there is
>> a skip zone.
>>
>
> Horse-pucky! Scoring rules determine who wants to work whom. For
> stations in Zones 3, 11, 12, 13, 29, 30 to have fun in a DX contest,
> there must be a real desire for other stations to work them. Those
> zones are remote from population centers, and for the most part,
> there's only 2-3 countries in a zone. VK is a continent larger than
> EU, yet only one country multiplier and two zone mults. EU is much
> smaller than South America, but EU has 5X the country multipliers.
>
> Distances DO matter on bands with skip zones. I cited examples in an
> earlier post. Stations and power being equal, I can work a LOT more
> mults on more bands in IARU, CQ, and ARRL DX contests from W1 than I
> can
from W6.
>
> We need FAR more than "ranking" by zone or geographical area. We need
> a system where an operator in all but the most remote parts of the
> world is at least in the same contest with those in the Atlantic
> basin, and where his final score is determined by comparison with his
> geographic peers. It IS possible to design scoring rules that achieve
> this. It's like the US Congress -- we simply need the WILL to do it.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|