CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Distance-Based Ranking

To: CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Distance-Based Ranking
From: Yuri Blanarovich <k3bu@optimum.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:49:41 -0500 (EST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Just for the record.
Waaay back I was also not very happy with the scoring systems and inequality and bias with major contests. After I was told "to come up with better contest" - I did some thinking, and tried to come up with THE CONTEST that is more fair, and I named it after genius who gave us radio - Nikola Tesla.

See the historical web site   http://www.teslaradio.org/Tesla_cup.htm
and links on the bottom.

I tried to publicize it in Dayton, only to find posters to be torn down.
I tried to get YCCC, FRC, CQ Magazine, YU clubs to cosponsor or support - naaaah! It is amusing now to see all the speculations, while there it was, but refused by the "authorities"

So here it is free for taking it, I am retiring from rentastations contesting and spending time with grand kids.

Oh, and for WRTC I suggested category of "Suitcase Station" where contestants will compete with own stations, all that fits in carry-on suitcase. (No power limit, just weight of 60 lbs.) Challenge to design and operate, real test of Boy and his radio. Qualifying runs done on continents, winners go to big one.

73 and GL!

Yuri, K3BU, VE3BMV, VE1BY, etc.

  
 
 On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 03:16 PM, Matt Murphy wrote:
 
 > I propose something like the following approach to calculating QSO points:

1) One point for every grid square traversed by the signal (the shortest
path between the two stations).
2) Add a point for each of the above grids that are at least 80% covered by
land.
3) Square the result.




On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Jim Brown wrote:

On Tue,11/10/2015 3:15 PM, Ward Silver wrote:

Distance-based scoring really won't work for bands on which there is a
skip zone.


Horse-pucky! Scoring rules determine who wants to work whom. For stations in Zones 3, 11, 12, 13, 29, 30 to have fun in a DX contest, there must be a real desire for other stations to work them. Those zones are remote from population centers, and for the most part, there's only 2-3 countries in a zone. VK is a continent larger than EU, yet only one country multiplier and two zone mults. EU is much smaller than South America, but EU has 5X the
country multipliers.

Distances DO matter on bands with skip zones. I cited examples in an
earlier post. Stations and power being equal, I can work a LOT more mults on more bands in IARU, CQ, and ARRL DX contests from W1 than I can from W6.

We need FAR more than "ranking" by zone or geographical area. We need a system where an operator in all but the most remote parts of the world is at least in the same contest with those in the Atlantic basin, and where his final score is determined by comparison with his geographic peers. It IS possible to design scoring rules that achieve this. It's like the US
Congress -- we simply need the WILL to do it.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>