CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Why SuperCheckPartial makes you assisted

To: kzerohb@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Why SuperCheckPartial makes you assisted
From: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:47:24 -0600 (CST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
 No Hans, especially in light of some of the subsequent posts... it illustrates 
my point that the word "assistance" is so often misused, sometimes deliberately 
by some, to the point of absurdity.  
 
IMHO, and with no disrespect intended:  The Assisted category should be called 
something else, without using that word, to avoid the ambiguity.  And the wise 
acres and the pot stirrers and all the rest.


That, or we'll be reading this thread, again, at least once more within the 
next year, and the next, and the next, ad infinitum ad nauseum.


73, ron w3wn

On 11/24/15, Radio K0HB wrote:


 

That's a red herring, Ron.

 

For purposes of radio sport I think we can agree that we are talking about the 
exchange of Information regarding call signs and/or QRGs with other operators, 
INFORMATION that we did not personally develop. 
 

 

 

__
73, de Hans, K0HB 

"Just a Boy and His Radio"? 
 

On Tuesday, Nov 24, 2015 at 09:09, Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>, 
wrote:

 Does "outside assistance" include or exclude one's spouse (or significant 
other, parental unit, or total stranger making a delivery from the corner deli) 
from providing the operator with snacks, a sandwich, or a drink? 







_______________________________________________ 

CQ-Contest mailing list 

CQ-Contest@contesting.com 

http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 

 
 
 
 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>