To: | "'W0MU'" <w0mu@w0mu.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time that the contest sponsors officially identify SCP as "assisted?" |
From: | "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net> |
Date: | Thu, 03 Dec 2015 11:34:03 -0800 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
W0MU hit the nail on the head. The key is the difference between an "aid" and "assistance." IMHO, computers, keyers, voice keyers, contest loggers, SCP, code readers and in house skimmers are all aids. No outside person is helping increase your score in real time (yes, outsiders built the hardware and wrote the software, but they are not in your shack helping you in real time) when you use aids. (Yes, I know contest sponsor rules differ with my opinion. It is their stadium, their football, and they make the rules and if you enter their contest, you have to abide by their rules.) You get assistance when using a spotting network. 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time that the contest sponsors officially identify SCP as "assisted?", Michael Adams |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Claiming assistance when not actually assisted, David Gilbert |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time that the contest sponsors officially identify SCP as "assisted?", W0MU |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time that the contest sponsors officially identify SCP as "assisted?", Helmut Mueller |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |