| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW popularity from EUR Perspective: data |
| From: | "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net> |
| Reply-to: | sawyered@earthlink.net |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Dec 2015 19:17:59 -0500 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
There is a reason why CQWW and ARRL DX are uniquely fun based on the format. There seems to be a constant theme of trying to have a global - all band contest with the CQ WW 160 or ARRL 10 Meter format. All areas contacted for points, states and provinces and DXCC are mults. It sounds like a fun NEW contest. Why won't some group passionate about the format organize it? I would suggest the weekend between ARRL DX Phone and Russian DX contest. Or the weekend between the SS contests. Any takers? Ed N1UR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW popularity from EUR Perspective: data, Joe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW popularity from EUR Perspective: data, Charles Harpole |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] US Call Areas as Multipliers, Radio K0HB |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] States and Provinces as Multipliers in DX Contests, John Laney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |