CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Fundamental Questions behind the endless Single Operator/Si

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Fundamental Questions behind the endless Single Operator/Single Operator Unlimited (aka Assisted) discussions
From: kd4d@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 16:56:06 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Good day, everyone:

For CW and SSB contests, I believe there are two fundamental questions behind 
the ceaseless debates about rules and merging of the categories.  I believe if 
we could answer these questions, the categories and rules would follow.  

     Note:  I believe that digital mode contests are fundamentally different.  
Since I don't operate in these,
            I am not going to address them.

Fundamental Questions:

1) Is a contest QSO between two physical places?
2) Is there an essential role for a human operator in Radiosport?

The issues in the first of these questions are, IMHO, very clearly described in 
Duane's (N9DG's) fine post proposing Connected and Unconnected categories.
     http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/2016-04/msg00163.html

A logical consequence of anwering "No" to the first question is the CQ 160 
Contest rule allowing limited use of a remote receiver (one and only one remote 
receiver located within 100KM of the main transmitter site) in the Assisted 
Category.

I am not aware of any clear answer to the second question.  I don't believe 
that there is a consensus on whether the answer is "Yes" or "No".

I believe the WRTC Rules are an excellent summary of the results of ansering 
"Yes" and defining such a role.  I also believe the CQ WW rule placing entrants 
using "local or remote call sign and frequency decoding technology" in the 
Assisted category is another result of answering "Yes" and defining such a 
role.  I believe that N9DG's proposal including and multiple overlay categories 
defining the role of automation is alsoa result of answering "Yes" to this 
question.

I also believe that, ultimately, the evolution of the Unlimited category will 
be guided by answering "No" to both of these questions.  If a single operator 
category continues to exist, I believe its evolution will be guided by both 
answering "Yes" to both of these questions and developing a definition of the 
essential role of a human operator.

The good news is that two (or more) categories can exist in the same 
competition.

73,

Mark, KD4D

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] Fundamental Questions behind the endless Single Operator/Single Operator Unlimited (aka Assisted) discussions, kd4d <=