CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] why checklog?

To: wk6i.jeff@gmail.com, cq-contest@contesting.com, RTTY@contesting.com, nccc@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] why checklog?
From: "Kermit \(aka Ken\) via RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Ktfrog007@aol.com
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 16:07:04 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Sometimes I operate without much serious intent or maybe just to  run some 
experiments with my station, ending up with a small number of  QSOs.  I'll 
send in a CHECKLOG as a courtesy to the sponsors and  participants so they'll 
know I was legit, not a busted call or a unique (or,  geez, log padding).  
It's easy to make a Cabrillo and email it off.   Just trying to be helpful.
 
73,
Ken, AB1J
 
 
In a message dated 5/23/2016 18:42:51 Coordinated Universal Time,  
wk6i.jeff@gmail.com writes:

I am  writing up the RTTY Roundup article, and in looking at the results
data  there is a fairly high number of checklogs.

I know some of the more  typical reasons why one would submit as checklog -
you operated outside the  rules (like choosing to run high power in an
NAQP), or maybe you just don't  give a darn about a score - but I'm
wondering about the other reasons that  maybe aren't so typical.

Any insights appreciated. 73 jeff  wk6i

-- 
Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com
Twisted Oak Winery ~  http://www.twistedoak.com/
Facebook ~  http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak
_______________________________________________
RTTY  mailing  list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>