A few years ago, an operator worked a CQWW contest, and in an effort to
trim a few seconds off his exchange, he omitted '599' from his exchange.
There was a lot of comments after the fact here on the CQ Contest
reflector, and in the end, he changed his entry to a checklog.
Remembering this, I entered an RTTY contest, but started off using the NAQP
macro which did not have '599' in the macro. I made about ~100 Q's before
I realized my mistake. I changed the macro, and finished the contest.
Knowing I had not followed the rules, I submitted my entry as a checklog.
So - mistakes happen. That way, the contest sponsor can cross-check the
QSO's, but *I* would not be dinged for not following the rules.
Tom - VE3CX
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am writing up the RTTY Roundup article, and in looking at the results
> data there is a fairly high number of checklogs.
>
> I know some of the more typical reasons why one would submit as checklog -
> you operated outside the rules (like choosing to run high power in an
> NAQP), or maybe you just don't give a darn about a score - but I'm
> wondering about the other reasons that maybe aren't so typical.
>
> Any insights appreciated. 73 jeff wk6i
>
> --
> Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com
> Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/
> Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|