CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Convergence and Change

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Convergence and Change
From: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 05:55:57 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
LU5DX said "I'm not trying to escape the answer.

Power cheating if of a total different nature and it is a matter of
infrastructure to prove that someone is cheating.

In the case of unclaimed assistance it is not."

 

Martin, you make a great point, but probably not the one you intended.

 

If Power cannot be proven and assistance could, why are we not preserving
the assisted and unassisted classes and making all power classes "merge" or
"converge" (I love the politically correct terms for elimination) since they
cannot be proven?

 

The dialog should simply be what is the cost of the required infrastructure
and does the user community want to pay for it or not?

 

Ed  N1UR

 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>