To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Convergence and Change |
From: | "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | sawyered@earthlink.net |
Date: | Fri, 27 May 2016 09:54:28 -0400 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Yuri's "confusion" on assistance vs "gadgets" is probably the reason why almost all of the DQs on unclaimed assistance come out of Europe. I think that just changing the category name to unlimited vs limited and listing the current criteria of the assisted vs unassisted categories might make a big difference of clarity for people. Most people want to do the right thing. Lets be as clear as we can on what the rules of the game by category are and be sure that unintended confusion is avoided wherever possible. There is ZERO ambiguity in the details of the rules banning skimmers in one's own shack from being allowed in the "unassisted" category. But is it "assistance" as might be translated into other languages? Not always. Lets just make it easy for people to follow the rules. Peak power is another game in EU that I have observed. It can take 2.5kW of output power in SSB for some lagging meters to register 1.5kW on peaks. Crank it up until the old meter touches 1.5kW is not uncommon - but WAY more power than allowed. Ed N1UR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: Own skimmer OK ?, Bob Kupps via CQ-Contest |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Convergence and Change, Kelly Taylor |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Convergence and Change, john |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Convergence and Change, Kelly Taylor |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |