CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Madness

To: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Madness
From: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 17:29:00 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <
cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:

> First, the data for the most common proposal- allow US stations to work
> other US stations- is simply unavailable in the public logs. Current rules
> give disincentives to work other US stations and the logs do not answer the
> question what will happen to current scores if US contacts count 1 point.
>
> Second, the current logs do not provide an answer to the question what
> happens when the rules provide incentives for additional multipliers and
> points.  If we get extra mults for US states contesters WILL change their
> behavior to reflect the new incentives.  On the other hand, saying that
> nothing will change is a pure speculation, contrary to normal human
> response to specific incentives.
>

Again, there is an example model of the changes being discussed: the CQWW
RTTY. Go look at the results. 73 jeff wk6i


-- 
Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com
Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/
Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>