CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RM11708 and the Future

To: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RM11708 and the Future
From: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 15:06:13 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com> wrote:

> Let us solve noise and transmitter IMD and it will be a lot easier for
> everybody to get along.


And in time honored tradition, if a station has a bad signal causing
interference, let's get his or her callsign and drop them a note. If my
transmitted signal is not clean, I would want to know about it, as I'm sure
you and everyone else would too. But wait, there are modes that cannot be
decoded without a proprietary box that has a price tag with a comma in it.

I realize this is outside the scope of RM11708 but how can two hams work
out a technical issue like this where one ham can't even reasonably learn
the identity of the other? That's what I have never understood.

Otherwise, you're spot on!

73 jeff wk6i

-- 
Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com
Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/
Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>