CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Time saver

To: <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Time saver
From: "Wigi, KL0R" <wigi@kl0r.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 14:46:12 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I have given this some thought. On RTTY, if you can avoid [SHIFT] or [UNSHIFT], 
It is probably worth a few Qs over the life of a contest. 5NN on RTTY is a bad 
idea... you're actually transmitting 
[upshift]5{downshift]NN[upshift]01[downshift]. 59901 saves two characters. Over 
the course of a minute you might save 4-6 characters, which would be 10 percent 
faster. If you're running the whole 48 hours, that's almost 5 hours of Qs. Of 
course, nobody runs constant rate for 48 hours, but it makes the most of the 
best rate hours.

Think of it this way. If you make 1500 Qs in 48 hours, that is 3000 extra 
characters sent... and those are only extra characters that are sent making 
actual Qs. That is 67 minutes of characters.

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of 
kzerohb@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2016 1:12 PM
To: CQ-Contest <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Time saver

Saw a few instances of cut numbers on CQ WW RTTY today.

Never thought of that time saving technique.

73, de Hans, KØHB
"Just a boy and his radio"™

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>