CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Alpha 87A Alpha Max -- Mea Culpa

To: "'Art Boyars'" <artboyars@gmail.com>, "'CQ-Contest Reflector'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Alpha 87A Alpha Max -- Mea Culpa
From: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:53:33 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Our Alpha Day wasn't just for 87As. It was for any Alpha amp, and our large 
club (YCCC) had plenty of owners with Alpha amps of all vintages. Also, the 
tech (it was Brad) setup shop at the house of an owner of what was at the time 
the brand-new 9500. Evidently, the first production run of that amp was so 
flawed Brad had to bring a 9500 with him to replace it. I suspect the company 
was so worried about the bad publicity the amp was getting that they were 
willing to send someone out to replace, install and test a new amp. Servicing 
other amps probably helped cover the cost of the trip. I paid $315 for Brad to 
replace and reprogram my CPU (I had replaced the MAX232 level converter, which 
was also fried.) 

Acom didn't charge me for a similar on-the-spot repair, but I traded the boss 
some software I'd written.

73, Dick WC1M

-----Original Message-----
From: Art Boyars [mailto:artboyars@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 10:31 PM
To: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Alpha 87A Alpha Max -- Mea Culpa

It's a good season for penitence.

Regarding WC1M's "Alpha Day" I had posted:

      Wow!  That's gotta be a lot of 87A's needing fixed
      to make it worth sending the technician out.

K3ZW points out that more models than the 87A were covered, so maybe there 
were, indeed, a lot of amplifiers in the population.  Still, without the 
numbers, we don't know.

73, Art K3KU


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>