sure, a great amateur contest station, not a profesional audio studio
You must be tired to repeat always the same. Other DQ ops told that you
never answer them, dont know what is best
73,
Jorge
2017-03-05 23:31 GMT-03:00 Scott Robbins via CQ-Contest <
cq-contest@contesting.com>:
> >Marcelo is building the best contest station in CX and he sit at the
> chair and spend a whole contest alone. I >don't like the the rules, so he
> and me as many others will not follow your advice.
> >The others that write here, told that W4PA don't say the reason they
> asked for the audio. This bad >communication from W4PA is what makes us to
> don't know if they disqualified him because he did not have the >audio or
> for suspicions of lying.
> Hi -
> The "best contest station" should also include the ability to record an
> entire contest, which is much easier than building towers, running many km
> of cables or the million other hardware things a serious contest operator
> has to worry about.
> CX2DK was asked for a recording after the 2015 contest, was unable to
> provide it, and the committee took no action. A year passed, another
> contest was run, we asked for the recording for 2016 and it was again not
> available. This time the action to move this entry to a checklog - not a
> disqualification - was taken.
> I will again suggest, if you are intent on being a serious entry in a
> single op category for CQWW to review the rules and assure you are able to
> comply with them.
> Scott RobbinsW4PA
> CQWW committee
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
--
73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|