CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposal for keeping UNassisted category

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposal for keeping UNassisted category
From: MARK BAILEY <kd4d@comcast.net>
Reply-to: MARK BAILEY <kd4d@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:45:09 -0500 (EST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I enjoy single operator categories and do not want to see them eliminated.  In 
at least many contests, the Assisted/Unlimited classes evolved from 
MULTI-OPERATOR categories - this is true of many of the ARRL Contests for 
instance.

We should do what we, as a community, can to deter cheating and detect 
cheaters, but reducing the game to a single category where there is no cheating 
because there are no rules (Multi-Operator, High-Power, remote receivers, 
multi-channel decoders, ...) is not the answer.

73,

Mark, KD4D




> On March 10, 2017 at 8:49 AM Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>  Wait...
> 
> 
> So because of cheaters, you want us (the contest community, collectively, 
> including sponsors, log checkers, and operators) to penalize those who (for 
> whatever reason) prefer SO by making it less interesting to cheaters?  
> 
> 
> Really?
> 
> 
> 73, ron w3wn
> 
> On 03/10/17, Mark van Wijk wrote:
> 
> Please do not spoil the fun of SO contenders by deleting the category for
> whatever reason.
> 
> 
> 
> Instead, change people behavior.
> 
> Make assisted/all allowed category MORE interesting for the cheaters:
> 
> - Raise the public recognition
> 
> - Better, more incentives
> 
> - Bigger prizes, larger plaques
> 
> 
> 
> On the other hand, lower the incentive for UNassisted, make it LESS 
> interesting
> to participate for cheaters
> 
> - No incentives
> 
> - No plaques
> 
> - Lower public recognition
> 
> 
> 
> Since we cannot influence peoples own responsibility and personal merits of
> honesty and pride, we have to make SO less and Assisted more attractive.
> 
> We might as well let go of the materialistic and large public recognition for 
> SO
> contenders. We can share recognition within our peer group, do not need the
> gold/wood.
> 
> Pride is in the accomplishment, the long road to and sharing 
> knowledge/operating
> experiences with our peer-friends.
> 
> 73 Mark, PA5MW
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>