CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Interleaving QSO's

To: cq-contest@contesting.com, Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Interleaving QSO's
From: Jamie WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:01:12 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I don't think the issue is interleaving qsos, or  two radios per band.....Most 
multis call CQ on one and sp on the other.....I don't think the issue is 
calling CQ on two bands at once ( interlocked of course) .....I think the issue 
is the same station calling CQ on two different frequencies in the same band....

On Mar 15, 2017 6:46 PM, Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think you will find that most of the bigger M/M's run 2 radios on each 
> band with 2 op's.  They can interleave on 4 or 5 bands at the same time. 
> Talk about taking up bandwidth :-)  73 
> Tom W7WHY 
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:23 AM, D Rodman MD <rodman@buffalo.edu> wrote: 
>
> > 
> > 
> > Secondly, any multi station can interleave QSO's merely by putting two ops 
> > at one radio, splitting the audio connections and sharing the microphone 
> > time.  I admit, this is not as nice as having a second transmitter because 
> > you are going to have the second operator talking into your ear but there 
> > are still going to be on air delays caused by the other operator 
> > transmitting anyway.  Having a second transmitter really isn't all that 
> > necessary at times, especially if the VFO's can be split to control 
> > separate transmit or receive antennas for additional directional coverage. 
> > 
> > 
> _______________________________________________ 
> CQ-Contest mailing list 
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com 
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>