For your situation, the Skyhawk will likely give similar performance but
not quite the bandwidth. How do the center drivens keep from banging
together in wind?
Suggest you consider a long log periodic, gives more bands, is great for
wide band scanning, ok rear and good side rejection. A Stepper is off the
table if you are worried about plastic end caps because Stepper's many
parts cause lots more causes for worry.
GL, 73, former TH6 and then TH7 owner, Charly (now using monobanders)
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 2:48 PM, K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us> wrote:
> My 28 year old TH7 needs to come down for maintenance, and I'm told the
> trap end caps MFJ now sells don't last long. I also may be just a matter
> of luck that no bugs have moved into any of the traps. So, I'd really like
> to replace it with a trapless antenna. The TH7 has served me well, having
> last been put up in 1993. It needs to be replaced before I'm too old to
> climb the tower!
>
> Here are the requirements:
>
> Performance comparable to TH7
> Boom length 24 feet or less
> No traps or fragile linear loading
> Can be assembled on the tower (as was the TH7 in 1993.)
>
> At this point, the Skyhawk appears to be my best option, at least of the
> tribanders available in this country. Any experience with the Skyhawk, or
> other suggestions?
>
> 73,
>
> Scott K9MA
>
> ----------
>
> Scott Ellington
>
> --- via iPad
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
--
Charly, HS0ZCW
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|