[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R - 3830scores.com Listings

To: Bruce Horn <bhorn@hornucopia.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R - 3830scores.com Listings
From: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 21:03:19 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Thanks Bruce!

This is an excellent addition to the 3830scores.com contest results... Now
we can visually compare the SO1R and SO2R...

73s Dave WN4AFP

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Bruce Horn <bhorn@hornucopia.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> I've updated the score listings on 3830scores.com to include indications
> of both SO2R and remote operations.
> 73 de Bruce, WA7BNM   (bhorn@hornucopia.com)
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Ritz" <w7vo@comcast.net>
> To: "cq-contest" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 8:05:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R
> While you don't necessarily need separate categories for SO2R verses SO1R,
> it would be interesting to note which is which, at least in the 3830
> listings. I know there is a box to checkmark as to whether the SO effort
> was SO2R, but nothing seems to ever be done with that data.
> If I'm in a contest as a Single Op I'm only ever going to run SO1R, the
> way it used to be. It would be nice to at least be able to compare my
> scores in 3830 with comparable stations. I've never going to beat a SO2R
> guy, but I'd like to know how I compare to other stations also running "old
> fashioned" SO1R. I do use the "tribander and wires" overlay for CQWW SO
> contests, but I guess with triplexers now in use these could also be SO2R
> now too.
> 73;
> Mike
> W7VO

Dave Edmonds
PK Ministry Webs
CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>