I think more mults would be fine but I have a hard time considering
carving up VE even more when the population or lack of in some parks are
already a problem.
I would love to be able to convince the sponsors that we need a South of
Denver, West of I25, North of Castle Rock east of the mountains mult.
Even with those constraints that probably includes more hams than some
areas! Hi!
On 11/7/2017 10:53 AM, Jeff Clarke wrote:
/VE9AA wrote/
/If ARRL contemplates any rule changes (nobody is saying they are) how
about this one? Allow me to enter SS and actually send an exchange
that says WHERE I ACTUALLY AM ! ! ! ie "NB"...hello ! It's a real
Province. Same as RI, WI or NV... Not lump me into an arbitrary RAC
section and have to send "MAR"? /Mike,
Everyone appreciates the participation from MAR/. /Even NL was well
represented this year! Unfortunately the multipliers for
Sweepstakes/are /ARRL sections not states and provinces.//So if you
had each of the MAR Provinces as multipliers then you would have to
change the multiplier for states that are split into two sections (For
example EPA and WPA) to be consistent. I know this probably not what
you wanted to hear :(
BTW I think the sponsors of some of the other contests have granted
the wishes of those of you up in the Canadian maritimes. But
unfortunately I really don't see an increase in activity up your way
in those contests.
Jeff
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|