CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Summary of Software and Transceivers used by WRTC teams

To: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Summary of Software and Transceivers used by WRTC teams
From: Jack Brindle via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@me.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2018 15:39:34 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
There is another possibility. It is possible that stations participating in 
IARU may have sent bad information to some WRTC participants, but not to 
others. This would not involve the WRTC judging at all, and would be hard to 
detect, although recordings would show it. This would be particularly bad if 
true, but possibly not too far out of line with some of the behavior we have 
seen in the past (cheerleading, etc). No idea how to counter something like 
this.

My own opinion is that I certainly hope it is not true.

73!
Jack, W6FB

> On Aug 8, 2018, at 6:54 AM, Roger Parsons via CQ-Contest 
> <cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
> 
> Jim, K9YC wrote:
> 
> "A competitor friend (who placed in the top third of the pack) told me 
> yesterday..... also had QSOs removed for exchange errors that were clearly 
> copied and logged correctly based on their recording."
> 
> You appear to be suggesting that the organisers deliberately falsified the 
> results for some competitors. That's a pretty serious accusation. If you have 
> hard evidence, it should be brought forward. If you don't, that comment is an 
> unreasonable attack on the organisers.
> 
> 73 Roger
> VE3ZI
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>