CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] sunspot cycle

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] sunspot cycle
From: <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 23:38:47 +0100
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
During this C24 minimum I see daily WW dx spots on my NCDXF/IARU HF Beacon 
monitor 24/7
On a 2x25ft  wire dipole  @15ft above ground
See  pa5mw.com

Wkd 772 Q's in the RDX contest , using a 2el trapped tribander at 40ft and a 
home made 40/80inv-L
>From a 28 by 28ft city-lot, 400W.

Just Wkd XR0ZRC on 20m using that same tribander 10ft above the roof.

Oh..I had to be " patient" and observe the band for a week and a half to be 
able to work them at the right opportunity.......goes with the hobby.

No need for any  "virtual reality" instant gratification mode.


73 
Mark PA5MW


-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com> On Behalf Of Jeff Clarke
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2019 22:36 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] sunspot cycle

If you're into FT8 there seems to be plenty of DX spotted on a daily basis to 
keep your typical DXer happy despite the bad radio conditions.

Can you see the scenario in the future that those casual contesters are going 
to call for the sponsors to all add FT8 as a valid mode for their contest? Hope 
it doesn't happen and dumb down contests to the point where no skills are 
required.

Jeff

On 3/24/2019 03:24 PM, Bill kollenbaum via CQ-Contest wrote:
> The post was not about the demise of contesting, it was about sunspots 
> numbers and propagation.  If you look at the numbers, they predict a flux 
> consistently in the 50s.  I can't remember ever seeing a number that low. We 
> have been banging around 70  or so for most of this year, with a few 
> exception like those right now (around 80).  Almost everyone seems to agree, 
> that at that number conditions are not very good Of course we will always 
> have some bands open,  but if the null in the sunspots continue through 2022 
> it is generally thought that this cycle will be extremely low at the peak 
> since there is a direct correlation between the length of the minimum and the 
> strength of the next cycle.
> This may or may not have an effect on contesting.  However, it is pretty easy 
> to see that it has had an effect on daily operating.
> KH7XS,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
> ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
> ,,,,
> Bill,
>
> You have made other statements about the demise of contesting. It's not 
> happening.
>
> For example, 2900 QSO's from New Mexico in ARRL DX CW a few weekends 
> ago. No sunspots. Great fun.
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
--
*Jeff Clarke*
Information Technology Professional
Ellerslie, Georgia

KU8E.com <http://www.ku8e.com/>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>