CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Impact of FT* Modes on DXpeditions

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Impact of FT* Modes on DXpeditions
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:16:51 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

I'm not fan of ARRL for just about anything, but it seems twisted logic to accuse them of "greed" for not making FT/JT a separate DXCC award when they would clearly make more money if they had made it a separate one.

As I've posted before, I have a very difficult time making a distinction between a typical RTTY contact in a contest or DXpedition (both of which feed DXCC) versus an FT8 contact.  Both are essentially push button QSOs.  If you disagree, please point out the pertinent differences.  I'll bet I can point out twice as many significant similarities as you can point out significant differences.

I'd rather be making CW contacts myself, but I'm just trying to be objective here ... versus you calling FT and JT "artificial modes".

73,
Dave   AB7E


On 8/14/2019 11:30 PM, Mats Strandberg wrote:
The new FT8 euphoria has forever changed the perception of DX-big, thanks to 
ARRL’s greed for
award revenue ;(

And, what we now see is the result of the wrong decision to equalize FTx,
JT and other artificial modes, with RTTY, SSB and CW, and accept them for
DXCC Mixed.

The correct way would have been to create FT/JT DXCC separate from Classic
DXCC...

DXCC as we all knew it, has been hurt tremendously by ARRL unthoughtful
decision to accept FT/JT in Mixed!

73 de RM2D (Mats)



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>