CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating category

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating category
From: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 20:32:24 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
The problem with the ARRL is they have the contest rules in multiple documents which make them too complicated to follow.

For example General Rules -> http://www.arrl.org/general-rules-for-arrl-contests-below-30-mhz

ARRL DX Rules -> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Contest%20Rules%20PDFs/2020/ARRL%20DX%20Contest%20Rules.pdf

If you didn't read the General Rules you might miss the statement -> "2.1.Single Operator: One person performs all transmitting, receiving, and logging functions as well as equipment and antenna adjustments." They don't repeat this statement in the actual ARRL DX Rules.

It's also odd they make this same statement for Single-Op Assisted ->  "2.2. Single Operator Unlimited: One person performs all transmitting, receiving, and logging functions as well as equipment and antenna adjustments. (Note: See rule 2.3.1.1)"

*2.3.1.1.*In those contests that do not have Single Operator Unlimited class, this category includes those single operators that use any form of spotting assistance such as from nets, packet or multi-channel decoders..

It also seems strange that they will allow a certain type of assistance for Single-Op Unlimited but have other limitations on other assistance. (2.2.1. Use of spotting assistance or nets (operating arrangements involving other individuals, DX-alerting nets, packet, multi-channel decoders such as CW Skimmer, etc) not physically located at the station is permitted.) You're either assisted or you aren't.

At least the new CEO is a contester and maybe he will sort this all out.

Jeff

On 10/5/2020 03:09 PM, Steve London wrote:
This is being reposted from a 2017 posting.

I know of a case from a few years ago where a single-op, operating
remotely, had an amplifier failure during the contest. The station host
swapped out the amplifier. This led to the operator having to reclassify
himself as multi-multi. Multi-single and Multi-2 could not be claimed,
because he violated their band change rules.

This might be a good one for the new ARRL CEO to tackle.

73,
Steve, N2IC

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Barry,

While each contest sponsor has their own rule definitions, ARRL has used
this
published definition for Single-Operator for nearly 20 years:

         2.1.Single Operator: One person performs all transmitting,
receiving,
and logging functions as well as equipment and antenna adjustments.

In ARRL contests, if a station host or other helpful person makes any
equipment
or antenna adjustments, whether locally or remotely, they cause the
operating
category to become Multioperator.   Meals, refreshments, etc don't enter the
ARRL's definition of assistance.  Assistance is when as the operator you are
unable to perform equipment, rotor or antennas adjustments/maintenance and
you
must call upon someone else's help (that help if embraced changes your
operating category to a Multiop profile in the ARRL contests).

Thanks for participating!


73,

Bart Jahnke, W9JJ
Contest Branch Manager
ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio™
225 Main St
Newington CT 06111
860-594-0232w9jj@arrl.org
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>