Ah, did anyone directly ask him?
73
> On Jul 15, 2021, at 5:03 PM, Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>
> wrote:
>
> Sorry, He would need to use KO1A as his call in order to be compliant. But
> he did not.
>
> Why would he not use KO1A as required?
>
> Ed N1UR
>
> From: Barry W2UP <w2up.co@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 4:52 PM
> To: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>
> Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation into the USA
>
> That one was easy. Look up the callsign on qrz.com<http://qrz.com>, then do
> a name search. It also brings up KO1A.
>
> Next...
>
> Barry W2UP
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 2:28 PM Edward Sawyer
> <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com<mailto:EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>>
> wrote:
> KO7SS wrote: "It would be easier to opine on this situation that is
> bothering you if you were to post up the callsigns in question, in public, on
> this reflector. There may be aspects of the details you do not know."
>
> Sure, just an example, IZ3EYZ operating as KE5JSY from likely a third station
> location in the US. (not KE5JSY - although this is quite unclear) Its simply
> recent and relevant to WRTC qualification.
>
> Ed N1UR
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|