To: | Hans Brakob <kzerohb@gmail.com>, Peter Sundberg <sm2cew@telia.com>, Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] E mail QSLs |
From: | Joe <nss@mwt.net> |
Date: | Fri, 7 Mar 2025 17:19:08 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
When I first got Licensed (1975) these E mailed QSL's wouldn't be worth
the ink they could be printed with.
I remember a QSL card MUST have the cancelled postmark on it! if it was mailed in an envelope you had to keep the envelope. So the checker could see the postmark. But at the same time while I remember that. Then what about the cards that came via the Buro? no Postmarks on them. Huh? Joe WB9SBD On 3/7/2025 1:22 PM, Hans Brakob wrote: ________________________________ Nothing new in that. LOTW, eQSL, QRZ, and others have provided similar services for decades. 73, de Hans, K0HB “Just a Boy and his Radio”™So people seem to upload their entire PC log and let the AI tool do the work for them.. via email.. sigh... 73 Peter SM2CEW_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CTY-3507 Country Files - 07 March 2025, Jim Reisert AD1C via CQ-Contest |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] E mail QSLs, Tom Epperly |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] E mail QSLs, Hans Brakob |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] E mail QSLs, pwhelton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |