CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 271, Issue 5

To: Bruce Sawyer <bruce.b.sawyer@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 271, Issue 5
From: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 15:21:54 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Was that N0AX or K7SS?  I remember K7SS/PTI for a stretch of time.

73 Rich NN3W

On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 3:19 PM Bruce Sawyer <bruce.b.sawyer@gmail.com>
wrote:

> About 35 years ago N0AX activated what he hoped would become a new DXCC
> entity, the Payallup Tribe of Puget Sound (
> https://www.puyalluptribe-nsn.gov/).  He had some roaring good pile-ups
> going during this effort and went through all the efforts of filing to
> become a new entity but in the end the DXCC told him, "No way!"
>
> N6NT
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 12:19 PM <cq-contest-request@contesting.com> wrote:
>
> > Send CQ-Contest mailing list submissions to
> >         cq-contest@contesting.com
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >         http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >         cq-contest-request@contesting.com
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >         cq-contest-owner@contesting.com
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of CQ-Contest digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >    1. Re: Changes to Canadian Sections may have consequences for
> >       (David Jaffe)
> >    2. Re: Changes to Canadian Sections may have consequences for
> >       Four ARRL contests (Jim Brown)
> >    3. Re: Changes to Canadian Sections may have consequences for
> >       (John Geiger)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 11:04:57 -0700
> > From: David Jaffe <davidajaffe@gmail.com>
> > To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Changes to Canadian Sections may have
> >         consequences for
> > Message-ID: <282CD8D1-E0CE-43B3-8C4B-7185AA4EAE29@gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=utf-8
> >
> > The real elephant in the contest multiplier room is DXCC!  If every tiny
> > politically-independent ?entity? can be a separate DXCC (Mt Athos,
> Vatican,
> > Sovereign Military Order of Malta, etc.), then the hundreds of Native
> > American sovereign and independent tribes should be separate entities.
> How
> > many are there, you ask??. 573!!
> >
> > Thus spake Google?
> >
> > ?Tribal nations possess inherent sovereignty, meaning they have the right
> > to govern themselves and their members, manage their affairs, and develop
> > their own laws and governance structures. This inherent authority
> predates
> > the United States and is distinct from state or local governments.?
> >
> > Whether they?ll require a special radio  license is a question?perhaps a
> > CW test in which the text to be copied describes the genocidal history of
> > American policy toward them?
> >
> > To paraphrase the old adage, ?Go west, young ham.?
> >
> > 73,
> > Dave WD6T
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 12:49:45 -0700
> > From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
> > To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Changes to Canadian Sections may have
> >         consequences for Four ARRL contests
> > Message-ID:
> >         <541af2fd-536a-4bb4-b57e-390480956c3a@audiosystemsgroup.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> >
> > Thanks for injecting sanity, Ed.
> >
> > 73, Jim K9YC
> >
> > On 7/5/2025 3:25 PM, ve4ear@gmail.com wrote:
> > > As the RAC Midwest director, I can assure you that the situation that
> > necessitated the creation of the YUK section has absolutely nothing to do
> > with contesting.  A developing program required the separation of YUK
> from
> > TER. It is not my place to divulge specific details at this time,
> > >
> > > These are ARRL contests, ARRL makes the rules and they can decide if
> > they want to recognize the new section or not.
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 02:35:57 +0000
> > From: John Geiger <wr6885@proton.me>
> > To: David Jaffe <davidajaffe@gmail.com>
> > Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Changes to Canadian Sections may have
> >         consequences for
> > Message-ID:
> >
> >
> <rkrH9w9nFAe7KQ8fJrBSE2r3zReC9_q9mDXIBUf9CvMabVlYJFBTkM6SpSuLujumsSpXJaxziriEfAhHUpr50m1dbIkae6SnzNInYEbULbQ=@
> > proton.me>
> >
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> >
> > I am sure that these Native American areas did something like try to
> > legalize murder they would find out that they aren't as sovereign as they
> > thought they were.
> >
> > The Vatican is truly a sovereign nation, Mt. Athos and SMOM really
> aren't.
> >
> > 73 John AF5CC
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> >
> > On Monday, July 7th, 2025 at 1:29 AM, David Jaffe <davidajaffe@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The real elephant in the contest multiplier room is DXCC! If every tiny
> > politically-independent ?entity? can be a separate DXCC (Mt Athos,
> Vatican,
> > Sovereign Military Order of Malta, etc.), then the hundreds of Native
> > American sovereign and independent tribes should be separate entities.
> How
> > many are there, you ask??. 573!!
> > >
> > > Thus spake Google?
> > >
> > > ?Tribal nations possess inherent sovereignty, meaning they have the
> > right to govern themselves and their members, manage their affairs, and
> > develop their own laws and governance structures. This inherent authority
> > predates the United States and is distinct from state or local
> governments.?
> > >
> > > Whether they?ll require a special radio license is a question?perhaps a
> > CW test in which the text to be copied describes the genocidal history of
> > American policy toward them?
> > >
> > > To paraphrase the old adage, ?Go west, young ham.?
> > >
> > > 73,
> > > Dave WD6T
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Subject: Digest Footer
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > End of CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 271, Issue 5
> > ******************************************
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>