On 2/11/2026 10:41 AM, Jeff Blaine wrote:
I always was taught that if your contest performance was lacking, then
it's up to me to take positive action to improve my end of the QSO.
Maybe that's working on my max speed. Or maybe it's a better RX
antennas for the low bands. Or optimizing strategy (e.g. let's try
again later when the QSB may be better). In short, to control the
things I can personally control, and treat the rest of the circumstances
as "given." Normally the view that "I wish they would change their
behavior to better suite me" is really inviting frustration and that's
just something I don't need more of.
I agree with what you were taught, BUT -- we're at a point with SS where
it's gonna die if we can't attract a LOT of new ops. Which means we've
got to slow down, at least when things are slow. And this applies to
"gateway" contests with simple exchanges that are entry points for new
CW contesters, like CQWW, WPX, RAC, ARRL 10M, FD, and state QSO parties.
AND we've got to slow down when we're trying to work through the auroral
zone when it's fluttery. And we've got to realize that when conditions
are difficult, we must be willing to send full numbers, not cut ones.
When I'm barely copying the other station, I need the time cues that
full numbers provide. I refuse to accept cut numbers for serial numbers
beyond T and N.
73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|