Hi Jim:
Go to <http://www.rac.ca/liceinfo.htm>http://www.rac.ca/liceinfo.htm them look
about half way down the first list for
"Canadian Amateur radio call sign prefix Map" and you've got it.
By the way there is a lot of other interesting stuff on the site to look at.
73 es GL
Bob
WA1OFR - FN42ma
At 07:19 PM 11/29/00 , you wrote:
>Hi Bob -
>Could you send me the URL for the ARC site you reference below.
>Thanks in advance.
>Bob
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Bob Johnson" <rjohnson@ici.net>
>To: "Jim Reisert AD1C" <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 10:52 AM
>Subject: Re: [ct-user] New AR10.DAT Needed ???
>
>
>>
>> Hi Jim:
>> Just went to the RAC web site and they have a nice multi-coloured map
>showing
>> the entire country with the callsign prefix and abbreaviation for each
>area.
>> This map is well worth printing to use as an OP-AID.
>>
>> Also when looking at the current AR10.DAT file, I see R1, R2, & R3 listed
>on
>> the "States/Provinces Map" for CT.? How are these defined ?? I didn't see
>> anything in the ARRL rules, but I could have missed it.? Can you help me
>> out on
>> this one ?
>>
>> TNX es 73
>> Bob
>> WA1OFR - FN42ma
>>
>> At 06:18 AM 11/29/00 , you wrote:
>> >At 10:22 PM 11/28/2000 -0500, Bob Johnson wrote:
>> >
>> >>Do we need to generate a new AR10.DAT file for the upcomming ARRL 10
>Meter
>> >>contest ?
>> >>
>> >>Reading rules in Nov. QST I see that Canada has a new Province/Call
>Area.
>> >>It is NU for Nunanut VY0.
>> >
>> > From
>>
><<http://www.arrl.org/contests/announcements/rules-10m.html>http://www.arr
l.org/contests/announcements/rules-10m.html><http://www.arrl.o/>http://www.
arrl.o
>> rg/contests/announcements/rules-10m.html
>> >
>> >5.2. Multipliers: (per mode, phone and CW).
>> >
>> >5.2.1. The fifty US states (plus District of Columbia).
>> >
>> >5.2.2. Canada NB (VE1, 9), NS (VE1), QC (VE2), ON (VE3), MB (VE4), SK
>> >(VE5), AB (VE6), BC (VE7), NT (VE8), NF (VO1), LB (VO2), YT (VY1), PE
>> >(VY2), and NU (VYØ).
>> >
>> >I guess I'll wait for Dan N1ND to confirm this, but it looks like you are
>> >right. If so, I'll put out an update.
>> >
>> >73 - Jim AD1C
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
>>
><<http://www.ad1c.com/>http://www.ad1c.com/><http://www.ad1c.com/>http://ww
w.ad1c.com
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> WWW:????????????????????? <http://www.k1ea.com/>http://www.k1ea.com/
>> Submissions:????????????? ct-user@contesting.com
>> Administrative requests:? ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
>> Problems:???????????????? owner-ct-user@contesting.com
>>
>>
>
--
WWW: http://www.k1ea.com/
Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com
Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-ct-user@contesting.com
|