Aha! I was caught by the perpetual 'station number misunderstanding' again!
Nonetheless, it works properly.
To change which station the QSO's will be logged as, use Alt-Y, or the RUN1
& RUN2 commands to toggle.
The "Stn #" displayed above the logging area indicates which "station #"
that computer is for CT networking purposes.
In the summary window, when it says "Station 1" this means it will be
logging as RUN1. When it says "Station 2", it will be logging as RUN2.
These terminologies need to be changed to be clearer.
I would suggest that CT be changed to use:
CPU # instead of 'Stn #' (network number)
Logging # (or simply RUN #) instead of 'Station #' (logging number)
Radio A/B instead of Radio 1/2 (and again, have this completely disabled
unless there are two radios defined)
Or something better that accomplishes the same thing and clears this
confusion.
N5NJ
P.S. No comment on the 10 minute rule issue.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
To: <ct-user@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:45 AM
Subject: Re: [ct-user] CT and M/2 in CQWW
> In 9.81.002 which I downloaded last night, it shows "STN #" correctly. I
> tried several.
>
> To my dismay, even though I have no radio defined, I still see the Radio 1
> indicator, and it will change to Radio 2 if I hit "Alt-."
>
> Hopefully, in a future version, multiple radio functions will be disabled
> unless two radios are defined in the setup screen.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Miller" <brianmiller@xtra.co.nz>
> To: <ki1g@cox.net>; <ct-user@contesting.com>
> Cc: "Doug McNeill" <dmcneill@clear.net.nz>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [ct-user] CT and M/2 in CQWW
>
>
> > Hi Rick
> >
> > We discovered the same problem tonight. In addition, we also noticed
that
> the Summary window label
> > is displaying "Station One" for both stations.
> >
> > I will log a bug report .....
> >
> > 73 and CU in CQ WW
> >
> > Brian ZL1AZE
> > for ZL6QH team
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Rick Davenport <ki1g@cox.net>
> > To: <ct-user@contesting.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 2:05 PM
> > Subject: [ct-user] CT and M/2 in CQWW
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I think I have found 1 problem with CT and M/2 in CQWW and it pertains
to
> > band changes. It seems that CT 9.81 tracks band change violations by the
> old
> > 10 minute rule and not 8 band changes per radio per hour. Or am I doing
> > something wrong ??? Any fixes Ken ??
> >
> > C U all IN CQWW
> > Rick KI1G
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CT-User mailing list
> > CT-User@contesting.com
> > CT-User-request@contesting.com Subject=unsubscribe to unsubscribe
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CT-User mailing list
> > CT-User@contesting.com
> > CT-User-request@contesting.com Subject=unsubscribe to unsubscribe
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user
>
> _______________________________________________
> CT-User mailing list
> CT-User@contesting.com
> CT-User-request@contesting.com Subject=unsubscribe to unsubscribe
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user
|