Well one of the things I really enjoy about NAQP is the exchange. It's
a way to (mostly) get to know some names behind the callsigns. But for
the state QSO parties etc, a standard scoring system would be a big plus.
Philip
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 07:41:19AM +0000, alsopb wrote:
> This whole issue of non-supported contests could be helped a lot by
> the contest sponsors.
>
> If they just formatted scoring and exchanges so that they could mimic
> one of the numerous existing supported contests it would be win-win.
> They would benefit from increased participation and we would benefit
> from having the contest already available.
>
> Note: Someone (preferably the contest sponsors) would have to shoehorn
> their mults into either sec files or country files. So what? Do it
> once and be done with it.
> We would then just have to load the appropriate SEC/CTY files for the
> contest of interest and call it say a WWCW contest.
>
> In my opinion, it is just an ego trip on the part of the sponsors to
> make their contest "different" and hence seem more important.
>
> 73 de Brian/K3KO
> _______________________________________________
> CT-User mailing list
> CT-User@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user
> CT on the web: http://www.k1ea.com/
_______________________________________________
CT-User mailing list
CT-User@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user
CT on the web: http://www.k1ea.com/
|