Hi Dan, I have a box loaded up with Mikrotik. Just don't know too much
about it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Metcalf" <danm@suncorstainless.com>
To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 4:55 PM
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Bandwidth Limiting in Version 4.02
> Norm
>
> You should take a linux type box and use it for bandwidth control I have
> scripts available that will do that.
>
> Dan Metcalf
> Wireless Broadband Systems
> dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com
> 781-658-2075
> www.wirelessbroadbandsystems.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Norm Young [mailto:npyoung@applegatebroadband.net]
> Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 7:53 PM
> To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Bandwidth Limiting in Version 4.02
>
> Thanks, Eric. I guess I'll just stay with v4.02 and hope nobody takes too
> much advantage of our symmetrical service!
>
> Message to Karlnet: Please fix this!
>
> Norm
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Meth" <emeth@iescomm.on.ca>
> To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 1:19 PM
> Subject: [Karlnet] Bandwidth Limiting in Version 4.02
>
>
> > Norm. This problem was reported to Karlnet several weeks ago and I think
> is
> > on their list of "one of these days we have to get around to that"
> > My solution, that was forced by another issue, was to downgrade to
version
> > 3.88 that does work properly in the way described earlier.
> > Another way, is to tell the customer he has bi-drectional service and is
> > similar to a fractional T1. It is a marketing gimmick to mask a
technical
> > problem.
> >
> > Eric Meth
> > IES Wireless
> > Cornwall, Ontario CANADA
> >
> >
> > >From: "Norm Young" <npyoung@applegatebroadband.net>
> > >To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> > >Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side
> > >Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:50:43 -0700
> > >Organization: Applegate Broadband
> > >Reply-To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> >
> > >Dan, I've tried this and I'm seeing some strange stuff. Like it
appears
> > >that setting the BW limit in either interface sets the d/l speed for
the
> > >customer, with the lowest number predominating.
> >
> > >For example:
> >
> > >wireless=280
> > >Ethernet=0 (wide open)
> > >Tested d/l speed=263 kbps
> >
> > >wireless= 130kbps
> > >ethernet=280kbps
> > >Tested d/l speed= 123 kbps
> >
> > >wireless= 280kbps
> > >ethernet= 130kbps
> > >Tested d/l speed= 123 kbps
> >
> > >It appears that traffic in either direction on these interfaces is
being
> > >limited to the speed set in the dialog.
> >
> > >Anyone else see this?
> >
> > >Norm
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
>
|