Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput?

To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput?
From: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Reply-to: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 14:50:06 -0400
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
your missing my question.


My question is DO I SETUP a DIRECT /30 route for EACH radio or is it
better to put all the radio's in a /24 and use 1 direct route?



Dan Metcalf
Wireless Broadband Sytems
dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com
www.wirelessbroadbandsystems.com



> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]
On
> Behalf Of Charles Chia Sheng Wu
> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 2:51 PM
> To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput?
> 
> in terms of cisco speed, a direct route of
> 
> 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 DIRECT 1
> 
> is
> 
> config t
> int e0/0
> ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
> no shutdown
> 
> does that help?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com
[mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
> Behalf Of Dan Metcalf
> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 12:20 PM
> To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput?
> 
> 
> Actually I was thinking like this
> 
> 
> PtMP = /30 for each radio, so you would add DIRECT routes for each
> radio?
> 
> 
> Or
> 
> PtMP = /24 = all RADIO'S go in the same subnet.
> 
> Dan Metcalf
> Wireless Broadband Sytems
> dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com
> www.wirelessbroadbandsystems.com
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com
[mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]
> On
> > Behalf Of Charles Chia Sheng Wu
> > Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 1:19 PM
> > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput?
> >
> > is this what you mean?
> >
> > PtP link b/n 2 radios = /30
> > base station ethernet ports @ a PoP = /29
> > PtMP radios = /26
> >
> > however, we don't backhaul w/ 2.4, we end up building our pops as
> follows
> >
> > cisco
> > vlans
> > AP - /26
> >
> > does this work
> >
> > -Charles
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
> > Behalf Of Dan Metcalf
> > Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 12:05 PM
> > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput?
> >
> >
> > HUH?
> >
> > Do you I setup /30 routes for each radio or do I just put radio in 1
> > subnet?
> >
> >
> > Dan Metcalf
> > Wireless Broadband Sytems
> > dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com
> > www.wirelessbroadbandsystems.com
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]
> > On
> > > Behalf Of Charles Chia Sheng Wu
> > > Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 1:09 PM
> > > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput?
> > >
> > > huh?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com
> > [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
> > > Behalf Of Dan Metcalf
> > > Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 11:57 AM
> > > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput?
> > >
> > >
> > > What  is the better to configure routing with karlnet?
> > >
> > > Do you setup a direct route for say 192.168.1.0 / 255.255.255.0
> > >
> > > And put each radio in that network or
> > >
> > > Do you setup a DIRECT route for each radio say 192.168.1.0 /
> > > 255.255.255.252?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Dan Metcalf
> > > Wireless Broadband Sytems
> > > dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com
> > > www.wirelessbroadbandsystems.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com
> > [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]
> > > On
> > > > Behalf Of Charles Chia Sheng Wu
> > > > Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 12:43 PM
> > > > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput?
> > > >
> > > > >Bridging
> > > >
> > > > which is a big problem, b/c now multiple clients on all your
> > > towers/POPs
> > > > are
> > > > all sharing the same broadcast domain
> > > >
> > > > on average, you'll double your latency, and 1/2 your throughput
> for
> > > each
> > > > additional hop that you bridge
> > > >
> > > > not a problem for that first hop, but when we start talking 4+
> hops,
> > > > things
> > > > can get hairy
> > > >
> > > > -Charles
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > > > ---
> > > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > > ---
> > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > ---
> > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> >
> 
> 
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> 


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>