Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Karlnet] SNR at base?

To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] SNR at base?
From: "George Minich" <gminich@toshiba.ca>
Reply-to: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 21:11:13 -0500
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
  To all that have asked:  I am using a 19 dbi grid on the satellite that is
about 1.5 miles from the base.  The base antenna is a 12dbi Tiltek with 120
degree coverage.  The noise hovers in the -75db region.  This seems a bit
high however I am using an amp.  The client side has a 35 to 40db SNR and
typically sees noise in the -90db region.  I think I may be in a high noise
area.  I sometimes see the noise dip down to -82db for 10 to 20 seconds at a
time and then back up to -75.  I am going to replace the vertical sector
with a horizontal model.  I do manage a 290Kbyte up/download with this
config so it can't be that bad.


  Someone had mentioned that I should use an 18dbi patch at the satellite.
Do patches usually "throw" the signal better?  I am just waiting for another
person to lite-up a 2.4Ghz telephone!

George

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] SNR at base?


> sounds kind of weak for an amped signal.  Are you using an amp at the AP
as
> well?  But what distance are we talking about here...what do the RF calcs
> say and what is the noise floor?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "George Minich" <gminich@toshiba.ca>
> To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:29 PM
> Subject: [Karlnet] SNR at base?
>
>
> >   Would you guys consider a 19db SNR at the base of an amped setup a
good
> > SNR?  Some customers further out have a 15 to 17db.  This seems low, but
> is
> > about the best I was able to score.  This is through the use of 19dbi
> grids
> > at the satellite end.  What do you guys typically see for base SNR if
your
> > base is amped?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > George
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Demarc (tony) 908-996-7995" <tonylist@wwwbiz.com>
> > To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:57 PM
> > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] KN Throughput
> >
> >
> > > John
> > >
> > > You can do this with two AP-1000 and good LOS and RF level to about to
> > > about 5Mb. With a little tweaking to get it optimal performance. Email
> > > me off list and we can go thought the details.
> > >
> > > Sincerely
> > > Tony Morella
> > > Demarc Technology Group
> > > Office: 908-996-7995
> > > Cell: 908-246-9170
> > > Fax: 908-847-0202
> > > email: tony@demarctech.com
> > > http://www.demarctech.com
> > > Open Chat Server http://www.demarctech.com:8000
> > > Yahoo IM: tonymorella
> > > Wireless Solution Provider
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com
> > > > [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of John Maxwell
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:26 PM
> > > > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > > Subject: [Karlnet] KN Throughput
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Anyone out there know the actual throughput that we can get
> > > > on a KN TC PtP link?  To this point, I've only seen about
> > > > 2mbps at the most.  I understood that they could do about 5-6mbps.
> > > >
> > > > Any words of wisdom?
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/ka> rlnet
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>