You are bridging your private IPs onto your network.
You shouldn't have it enabled if you are enabling NAT.
But like Charles said it is recommended that you use the radio interface IP.
Nate
-----Original Message-----
From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
Behalf Of Brett Hays
Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 10:37 PM
To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Configurator ip confusion
Actually, bridging is enabled, and I take it that is the problem.
Brett
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>
To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 9:45 PM
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Configurator ip confusion
> is bridging disabled? check ARP tables
>
> also...it's recommended that you login to the unit via its outside
interface
> IP
>
> -Charles
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
> Behalf Of Brett Hays
> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 8:17 PM
> To: Karlnet List
> Cc: Kyle & Monica Stuckwish
> Subject: [Karlnet] Configurator ip confusion
>
>
> I am sure I am just missing something elementary, but I am having a lot of
> trouble with the latest configurator when doing installations.
>
> From our noc, the configurator works great. However, when we use it on a
> laptop to do link tests and aim in new cpe units for installs, it seems to
> get all mixed up on ip addresses. Here's what's happening.
>
> All of our cpe's (rg1100's running Karlnet) get a real world ip via dhcp
> from the access point. They all run nat and dhcp on their ethernet ports
> and all have 10.0.1.1 as the ethernet ip. When I am at a customer site
and
> try to do a link test or open config on a unit I am plugged directly into,
> the configurator will open up a unit somewhere else on the network.
>
> How can I force the configurator to open config or link test on the
directly
> connected rg rather than another one on the net. This is really confusion
> as the numbers are non-routable and shouldn't be showing up beyond the
radio
> port anyway? I have heard of leaky NAT and I suppose that's what is going
> on here, but what can I do about it?
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
|