Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

[Karlnet] to bridge or not to bridge

To: "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@wispnotes.com>
Subject: [Karlnet] to bridge or not to bridge
From: "wesley allison" <scgn@pipeline.com>
Reply-to: wesley allison <scgn@pipeline.com>, Karlnet Mailing List<karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 00:24:08 -0500
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Ok, you may remember me and my router questions to the list a few weeks back 
and I would like to get a consensus about my network plan. I am about to go 
live with my first tower and I wanted to double check some things. I am 
planning to rout my network and my clients. I am going to setup my base station 
with a public address so I can remote administrate, then I am going to use 
172.16.x.x for my internal network and my clients will have 10.10.x.x or 
something. The rg-1000's will have a 172.16.x.x address on the wireless side 
and 10.10.x.x on the Ethernet side. I hope to create my network so I can see 
and admin my client equipment and base station wile letting my users do what 
they want with the 10.10.x.x address, like network a few home computers without 
user ip's stepping on each other. So my question is do I have a sound plan or 
should I just bridge and not mess with all the setup? I would like to know some 
of the pitfalls from everyone that has been doing this awhile.

Wes
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>