As do we. We just implemented NAT/DHCP on everything across the board.
Regards,
Jayson A. Baker
Peak Internet Solutions
-----Original Message-----
From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]
On Behalf Of Larry Yunker (Cyber Broadcasting)
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 2:48 PM
To: Karlnet Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Reduction of Karlnet features w/out notification.
We almost exclusively use Karlnet SEC with NAT AND DHCP. I'd say about 5
out of every 100 sites we install uses bridging and NONE of our SEC clients
use routing.
I certainly hope that the SEC license has not been neutered to leave it
without NAT and DHCP.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
To: "'Karlnet Mailing List'" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:33 PM
Subject: [Karlnet] Reduction of Karlnet features w/out notification.
> Just FYI, not trying to start any flaming, but be aware that karlnet is
> working on removing features like NAT & DHCP from the SR-4000 & possibly
> others. We started flashing CPE's for our contractors to have next week
> & were met with an absence of NAT and DHCP as options. This was a
> change that was made last night without notification, thus I am posting
> here.
>
> Our standardized install entails contractors picking up RG's or KN's
> with NAT & DHCP so they always have a standard installation & don't need
> to understand IP addressing. This is important when you have several
> different subnets that they will be connecting to (i.e. different towers
> & channels). We then connect remotely on an as-needed basis & change
> settings if requested (i.e. client needs a public or static IP), but by
> default they're getting a NAT IP. We have found this to be the best way
> to simplify things for installers.
>
> I'd appreciate input on this concept as I know Karlnet monitors this
> thread. If many ISP's use the NAT & DHCP it may help motivate them in
> our favor. If not, it will help karlnet relieve overhead by not
> offering these features in the future. To confirm, if you're using
> bridging or routing as a normal setup, this won't effect anything, so
> don't stress. However, if you normally implement NAT/DHCP it may not be
> there anymore as of 7pm last night. You will still pay the same for the
> licenses, but received reduced features unless you notify karlnet. We
> found them to be interested in working with us to meet our needs, so
> this is more of a speed bump than a brick wall. They have offered to
> edit our web login, possibly all web logins, at license-it.com to offer
> options for NAT/DHCP, so voice your approval or disapproval so that they
> know what their users like.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve Deaton
> IT Director
> Texas Broadband, Inc.
> (888)868.3835 ext 85 (office)
> 979.289.0148 (office)
> 979.289.5117 (fax)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of Ben Polson
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 2:38 PM
> To: Karlnet Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Conversion of SNR values to dB
>
> Thanks Phil. Sure, I'd love to see what this has produced for you.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> > [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]On Behalf Of Phil
> > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 12:33 PM
> > To: 'Karlnet Mailing List'
> > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Conversion of SNR values to dB
> >
> >
> > I'm not sure if it is correct but I've been dividing by 2 and then
> > subtracting 95. I can show some examples of my S/N graphs that I
> > generate for all of our customers and APs if anyone wants to see them.
> > (not attached of course)
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ben Polson [mailto:bsp@bandwave.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:33 AM
> > To: Karlnet Mailing List
> > Subject: [Karlnet] Conversion of SNR values to dB
> >
> > Does anyone know the algorithm to convert the INTEGER values returned
> > from
> > the OIDs for signal and noise into dB values?
> >
> > A signal value of 86 and noise value of 10 aren't as helpful as the dB
> > values. Thanks in advance.
> >
> > -Ben.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>
>
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
|