We use Turbocell w/ NAT extensively in CPE, so removal of this would be
unacceptable to us.
-Ben.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]On Behalf Of Larry Yunker (Cyber
> Broadcasting)
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 1:48 PM
> To: Karlnet Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Reduction of Karlnet features w/out notification.
>
>
> We almost exclusively use Karlnet SEC with NAT AND DHCP. I'd say about 5
> out of every 100 sites we install uses bridging and NONE of our
> SEC clients
> use routing.
>
> I certainly hope that the SEC license has not been neutered to leave it
> without NAT and DHCP.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>
> To: "'Karlnet Mailing List'" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:33 PM
> Subject: [Karlnet] Reduction of Karlnet features w/out notification.
>
>
> > Just FYI, not trying to start any flaming, but be aware that karlnet is
> > working on removing features like NAT & DHCP from the SR-4000 & possibly
> > others. We started flashing CPE's for our contractors to have next week
> > & were met with an absence of NAT and DHCP as options. This was a
> > change that was made last night without notification, thus I am posting
> > here.
> >
> > Our standardized install entails contractors picking up RG's or KN's
> > with NAT & DHCP so they always have a standard installation & don't need
> > to understand IP addressing. This is important when you have several
> > different subnets that they will be connecting to (i.e. different towers
> > & channels). We then connect remotely on an as-needed basis & change
> > settings if requested (i.e. client needs a public or static IP), but by
> > default they're getting a NAT IP. We have found this to be the best way
> > to simplify things for installers.
> >
> > I'd appreciate input on this concept as I know Karlnet monitors this
> > thread. If many ISP's use the NAT & DHCP it may help motivate them in
> > our favor. If not, it will help karlnet relieve overhead by not
> > offering these features in the future. To confirm, if you're using
> > bridging or routing as a normal setup, this won't effect anything, so
> > don't stress. However, if you normally implement NAT/DHCP it may not be
> > there anymore as of 7pm last night. You will still pay the same for the
> > licenses, but received reduced features unless you notify karlnet. We
> > found them to be interested in working with us to meet our needs, so
> > this is more of a speed bump than a brick wall. They have offered to
> > edit our web login, possibly all web logins, at license-it.com to offer
> > options for NAT/DHCP, so voice your approval or disapproval so that they
> > know what their users like.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Steve Deaton
> > IT Director
> > Texas Broadband, Inc.
> > (888)868.3835 ext 85 (office)
> > 979.289.0148 (office)
> > 979.289.5117 (fax)
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> > [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of Ben Polson
> > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 2:38 PM
> > To: Karlnet Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Conversion of SNR values to dB
> >
> > Thanks Phil. Sure, I'd love to see what this has produced for you.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> > > [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]On Behalf Of Phil
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 12:33 PM
> > > To: 'Karlnet Mailing List'
> > > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Conversion of SNR values to dB
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if it is correct but I've been dividing by 2 and then
> > > subtracting 95. I can show some examples of my S/N graphs that I
> > > generate for all of our customers and APs if anyone wants to see them.
> > > (not attached of course)
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ben Polson [mailto:bsp@bandwave.net]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:33 AM
> > > To: Karlnet Mailing List
> > > Subject: [Karlnet] Conversion of SNR values to dB
> > >
> > > Does anyone know the algorithm to convert the INTEGER values returned
> > > from
> > > the OIDs for signal and noise into dB values?
> > >
> > > A signal value of 86 and noise value of 10 aren't as helpful as the dB
> > > values. Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > > -Ben.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > ---
> > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
|